On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > As a preparation to expanding Hyper-V CPU features early, move > hyperv_limits initialization to x86_cpu_realizefn(). > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> > --- > target/i386/cpu.c | 5 +++++ > target/i386/cpu.h | 1 + > target/i386/kvm.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c > index e605399eb8c0..ef3c672cf415 100644 > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c > @@ -6648,6 +6648,11 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error > **errp) > cpu->hyperv_version_id[0] = 0x00001bbc; > cpu->hyperv_version_id[1] = 0x00060001; > > + /* Hypervisor implementation limits */ > + cpu->hyperv_limits[0] = 64; > + cpu->hyperv_limits[1] = 0; > + cpu->hyperv_limits[2] = 0; > + > if (cpu->ucode_rev == 0) { > /* The default is the same as KVM's. */ > if (IS_AMD_CPU(env)) { > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h > index 2630ffd2d4b2..095d0bf75493 100644 > --- a/target/i386/cpu.h > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h > @@ -1662,6 +1662,7 @@ struct X86CPU { > uint32_t hyperv_vendor_id[3]; > uint32_t hyperv_interface_id[4]; > uint32_t hyperv_version_id[4]; > + uint32_t hyperv_limits[3]; > > bool check_cpuid; > bool enforce_cpuid; > diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c > index 169bae2779a4..720c30e9df17 100644 > --- a/target/i386/kvm.c > +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c > @@ -1253,6 +1253,15 @@ static int hyperv_handle_properties(CPUState *cs, > env->features[FEAT_HYPERV_EBX] = c->ebx; > env->features[FEAT_HYPERV_EDX] = c->eax; > } > + > + c = cpuid_find_entry(cpuid, HV_CPUID_IMPLEMENT_LIMITS, 0); > + if (c) { > + cpu->hv_max_vps = c->eax; > + cpu->hyperv_limits[0] = c->ebx; > + cpu->hyperv_limits[1] = c->ecx; > + cpu->hyperv_limits[2] = c->edx; > + } > +
Sam question I had for vendor id and version id: should it go to a separate patch as it changes behavior of hv-passthrough? > c = cpuid_find_entry(cpuid, HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO, 0); > if (c) { > env->features[FEAT_HV_RECOMM_EAX] = c->eax; > @@ -1355,7 +1364,9 @@ static int hyperv_handle_properties(CPUState *cs, > c = &cpuid_ent[cpuid_i++]; > c->function = HV_CPUID_IMPLEMENT_LIMITS; > c->eax = cpu->hv_max_vps; > - c->ebx = 0x40; > + c->ebx = cpu->hyperv_limits[0]; > + c->ecx = cpu->hyperv_limits[1]; > + c->edx = cpu->hyperv_limits[2]; > > if (hyperv_feat_enabled(cpu, HYPERV_FEAT_EVMCS)) { > __u32 function; > -- > 2.25.4 > -- Eduardo