On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:28:51PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:56:06PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > The distinction between short life and long life Linux distributions > > turned out to be redundant. They can both be covered in a simple way > > by noting support will target the current release, and the previous > > release for a period of two years or until its EOL. This rule can also > > apply to the other UNIX based distros, leaving only Windows needing a > > different set of rules. > > > > This also clarifies that Debian LTS is out of scope, because the LTS > > support is provided by a separate group from the main Debian maintainer > > team. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > > --- > > > > This is a spin off from the Python 3.5 thread > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg06358.html > > > > docs/system/build-platforms.rst | 59 ++++++++++----------------------- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > > b/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > > index 9734eba2f1..03d2fd217f 100644 > > --- a/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > > +++ b/docs/system/build-platforms.rst > > @@ -29,51 +29,28 @@ The Repology site https://repology.org is a useful > > resource to identify > [...] > > +Linux OS, macOS, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD > > +----------------------------------------- > [...] > > +For FreeBSD, decisions will be made based on the contents of the ports > > tree; > > +for macOS, `HomeBrew`_ will be used, although `MacPorts`_ is expected to > > carry > > +similar versions. > > Shouldn't we mention NetBSD and OpenBSD too?
Hmm, yes, i updated the section heading but not the text Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
