Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:
> Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> I let this series slide to get my Error API rework done, along with much
>> else. My sincere apologies!
>>
>> Unsurprisingly, it needs a rebase now. I suggest to let me review it as
>> is first.
>
> I'm done with v6. Summary:
>
> * A few trivial things to correct here and there.
>
> * A few ideas to improve things in relatively minor ways.
>
> * PATCH 03 looks "why bother" to me until PATCH 09 makes me suspect you
> did the former to enable the latter. If you had captured that in your
> commit message back then, like you did for the similar PATCH 05, I
> wouldn't be scratching my head now :)
>
> * I dislike PATCH 06, and would like to explore an alternative idea.
>
> * PATCH 08 makes hairy monitor code even hairier, but I don't have
> better ideas.
>
> * I don't feel comfortable as a sole reviewer of the AIO magic in PATCH
> 10-12. Let's ask Stefan for an eye-over.
>
> I'd like to proceed as follows. You rebase, and address "easy" review
> comments (you decide what's easy). Post as v7, cc'ing Stefan for the
> AIO magic and David Gilbert for HMP. While they review (hopefully), I
> explore a replacement for PATCH 06. And then we touch bases and decide
> how to get this thing wrapped.
I explored:
Subject: Ways to do per-coroutine properties (was: [PATCH v6 06/12]
monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:09:19 +0200 (3 weeks, 5 days, 21 hours ago)
Message-ID: <87a6z6wqkg.fsf...@dusky.pond.sub.org>
May I have v7? Feel free to keep your PATCH 06. If I decide to replace
it, I can do it myself, possibly on top.
