On 08/04/2011 07:59 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 03.08.2011 23:42, schrieb Juan Quintela:
Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
On 08/03/2011 04:00 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
I don't have a problem with Paolo's new protocol. In fact, I'm strong
in favor of applying it to master. But I don't like the idea of
adding a new migration protocol with no testing in master before
putting it in a release.
I have. If we are changing a protocol in an incompatible version, we
can remove a lot of warts that current descriptions have. Not that
Paolo protocol is bad, but if we are going to do some change, adding
things like size, removing previous warts, etc is the way to go.
So how about stating clearly that migrating between 0.x and 1.x won't
work and using the next few months to develop a sane migration protocol?
I'm all for it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
We'll still have to do something about 0.15 and it's not very nice to
break migration twice, but seems there is no way around it.
Kevin
