On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 20:44, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 19/08/20 21:04, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> is it really that important? We've changed single target build > >> rules already (from subdir-x86_64-softmmu to x86_64-softmmu/all > >> for one), which broke quite some mostly automatic build > >> systems which needed some fixing. Moving executables isn't a > >> big deal after that, methinks.. > > It breaks my setups and also my muscle memory for where > > executables live. So this is the limit of how much I'm > > willing to allow Meson to mess us around, I think. > > It's totally possible to accomodate this and I appreciate the help and > effort you're putting into something that you (understandably) are not > too confident in. > > However, this change was already in the first series that was posted > like a year ago...
It's a hundred-and-fifty patch series, and I can't review everything. I took it on trust that it would be basically a drop-in replacement for our current makefile setup. thanks -- PMM
