On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:52 PM Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 8/12/20 10:38 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Richard Henderson > > <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> As reported by Andrey, I was missing the complete ISS info for > >> the Data Abort raised upon a synchronous tag check fail. > >> > >> The following should fix that. All the twisty little rules for > >> the ISS.ISV bit are already handled by merge_syn_data_abort. > >> Probably the most important bit that was missing was ISS.WnR, > >> as that is independent of ISS.ISV. > >> > >> Andrey, will you please test? > > > > Looks like WnR is now being set properly, but SAS is still always 0. > > Are you looking at ESR_EL1? > > On page D13-2992 of revision F.a: > > # ISV is 0 for all faults reported in ESR_EL1 or ESR_EL3. > > which means that ISS[23:14] are RES0, which includes SAS.
+more Arm and Google people Is this known? Do we not get access size when MTE fault happens?
