On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:39:23 -0300 > Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:41 +0200 >> Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de> wrote: >> >>> On 2011-07-28 17:18, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200 >>>> Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote: >>>>>> On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300 >>>>>>> Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote: >>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz >>>>>>> Capitulino<lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> > > This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to >>>>>>> resume >>>>>>>> > > execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command). >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > Today, we allow the user to resume execution even when: >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > o the guest shuts down and -no-shutdown is used >>>>>>>> > > o there's a kvm internal error >>>>>>>> > > o loading the VM state with -loadvm or "loadvm" in the >>>>>>> monitor fails >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > I think only badness can happen from the cases above. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I'd suppose a system_reset should bring the system back to >>>>>>> sanity and >>>>>>>> > then clear vm_permanent_stopped (where's -ly?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's -ly? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> permanent-ly. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> > except maybe for KVM >>>>>>>> > internal error if that can't be recovered. Then it would not very >>>>>>>> > permanent anymore, so the name would need adjusting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently, all kvm internal errors are recoverable by reset (and >>>>>>>> possibly by fiddling with memory/registers). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, but a poweroff in the guest isn't recoverable with system_reset >>>>>>> right? Or does it depend on the guest? >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, it's not recoverable if you shut the power down where the tractor >>>>>> beam is coupled to the main reactor. >>>>> >>>>> system_reset will bring all emulated devices back into their power-on >>>>> state - unless we have remaining bugs to fix. Actually, one may consider >>>>> issuing this reset automatically on vm_start after "permant" vm_stop. >> >> The only permanent vm_stop we'd have is poweroff when -no-shutdown is used. >> >> Are you saying that system_reset should be able to recover from that too? > > It already does, so we don't have permanent stops.
Exactly. We just have stops over inconsistent states that require a reset to continue with anything useful. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature