On 5/29/20 7:16 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.05.2020 14:58, Eric Blake wrote:
On 4/2/20 2:42 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Ping!

It's a fix, but not a degradation and I'm afraid too big for 5.0.

Still, I think I should ping it anyway. John, I'm afraid, that this all is for your branch :)

Just noticing this thread, now that we've shuffled bitmaps maintainers. Is there anything here that we still need to include in 5.1?

Yes, we need the whole series.

I'm starting to go through it now, to see what is still worth getting in to 5.1-rc2, but no promises as it is a long series and I don't want to introduce last-minute regressions (the fact that this missed 5.0 says that 5.1 will be no worse than 5.0 if we don't get this in until 5.2).

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


Reply via email to