2011/7/28 <tsnsa...@gmail.com>:
>
> At Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:51:08 +0200,
> Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, <tsnsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > At Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:22:38 +0200,
> > > Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> > >
> > >> clear interrupt request if the interrupt priority < CPU pil
> > >> clear hardware interrupt request if interrupts are disabled
> > >
> > > Not directly related to the fix, but I'd like to note a problem
> > > of hw/sun4u.c interrupt code:
> > >
> > > The interrupt code probably mixes hardware interrupts and
> > > software interrupts.
> > > %pil is for software interrupts (interrupt_level_n traps).
> > > %pil can not mask hardware interrupts (interrupt_vector traps);
> > > the CPU raises interrupt_vector traps even on %pil=15.
> > > But in cpu_check_irqs() and cpu_set_irq(), hardware interrupts
> > > seem to be masked by %pil.
> >
> > The interrupt_vector traps are currently not implemented, are they?
> > So it's hard to tell whether they are masked.
>
> Yes, interrupt_vector is not implemented yet.
Ah, I intended to write:
No, interrupt_vector is not implemented yet.
I'm very sorry for my engrish :-(
> I failed to explain the problem.
> The problem is that cpu_set_irqs() should raise interrupt_vector
> traps but it raises interrupt_level_n traps actually.
>
> sun4uv_init() calls qemu_allocate_irqs() with cpu_set_irq as
> the 1st argument. The allocated irqs (the irq variable) are
> passed to pci_apb_init(). APB should generate interrupt_vector
> traps (hardware interrupts), not the interrupt_vector_n traps.
> The interrupts from APB would be reported by cpu_set_irq(),
> but cpu_set_irq() seems to generate interrupt_vector_n traps.
>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> hw/sun4u.c | 6 ++++--
> > >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/sun4u.c b/hw/sun4u.c
> > >> index d7dcaf0..7f95aeb 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/sun4u.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/sun4u.c
> > >> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void cpu_check_irqs(CPUState *env)
> > >> pil |= 1 << 14;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> - if (!pil) {
> > >> + if (pil < (2 << env->psrpil)){
> > >> if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
> > >> CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Reset CPU IRQ (current interrupt %x)\n",
> > >> env->interrupt_index);
> > >> @@ -287,10 +287,12 @@ void cpu_check_irqs(CPUState *env)
> > >> break;
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >> - } else {
> > >> + } else if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
> > >> CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Interrupts disabled, pil=%08x pil_in=%08x
> > >> softint=%08x "
> > >> "current interrupt %x\n",
> > >> pil, env->pil_in, env->softint,
> > >> env->interrupt_index);
> > >> + env->interrupt_index = 0;
> > >> + cpu_reset_interrupt(env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> 1.7.3.4
> > >
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Tsuneo Saito <tsnsa...@gmail.com>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Artyom Tarasenko
> >
> > solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
>
> ----
> Tsuneo Saito <tsnsa...@gmail.com>
