On 7/22/20 5:50 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Remove setting of cs->halted from cpu_devinit(), which seems out of place
> when compared to similar code in other architectures (e.g., ppce500_init()
> in hw/ppc/e500.c).
>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauer...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> NB: I was only able to test that this patch builds. I wasn't able to
> run it.
>
> diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> index 766e79bb5e..7b3042a801 100644
> --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> @@ -831,7 +831,6 @@ static void cpu_devinit(const char *cpu_type, unsigned
> int id,
> } else {
> qemu_register_reset(secondary_cpu_reset, cpu);
> cs = CPU(cpu);
> - cs->halted = 1;
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cs), "start-powered-off", true,
> &error_abort);
> }
>
Why not squash with previous patch?
