On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 06:26:23AM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200619125413.2210-1-kcham...@redhat.com/
[...] > clang -iquote /tmp/qemu-test/build/tests -iquote tests -iquote > /tmp/qemu-test/src/tcg/i386 -isystem /tmp/qemu-test/src/linux-headers > -isystem /tmp/qemu-test/build/linux-headers -iquote . -iquote > /tmp/qemu-test/src -iquote /tmp/qemu-test/src/accel/tcg -iquote > /tmp/qemu-test/src/include -iquote /tmp/qemu-test/src/disas/libvixl > -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -Werror -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=address > -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -fPIE -DPIE > -m64 -mcx16 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wall -Wundef -Wwrite-strings > -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -std=gnu99 > -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k > -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wendif-labels > -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wno-initializer-overrides -Wno-missing-include-dirs > -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-typedef-redefinition > -Wno-tautological-type-limit-compare -fstack-protector-strong > -I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -DSTRUCT_IOVEC_DEFINED -I/usr/include/libpng16 > -I/usr/include/spice-1 -I/usr/include/spice-server -I/usr/include/cacard > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/nss3 > -I/usr/include/nspr4 -pthread -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid > -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests > -I/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/qtest -MMD -MP -MT tests/test-crypto-tlssession.o > -MF tests/test-crypto-tlssession.d -g -c -o tests/test-crypto-tlssession.o > /tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/test-crypto-tlssession.c > /tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/qht-bench.c:287:29: error: implicit conversion from > 'unsigned long' to 'double' changes value from 18446744073709551615 to > 18446744073709551616 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-float-conversion] > *threshold = rate * UINT64_MAX; > ~ ^~~~~~~~~~ > /usr/include/stdint.h:130:23: note: expanded from macro 'UINT64_MAX' I don't think this failure is related to the submitted patch. Do I need to respin? [...] -- /kashyap
