Le 30/06/2020 à 09:55, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> Add fallthrough annotations to be able to compile the code without
> warnings when using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS. Looking
> at the code, it seems like the fallthrough is indeed intended here,
> so the comments should be appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/net/can/can_sja1000.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/net/can/can_sja1000.c b/hw/net/can/can_sja1000.c
> index ea915a023a..299932998a 100644
> --- a/hw/net/can/can_sja1000.c
> +++ b/hw/net/can/can_sja1000.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ void can_sja_mem_write(CanSJA1000State *s, hwaddr addr, 
> uint64_t val,
>              break;
>          case 16: /* RX frame information addr16-28. */
>              s->status_pel |= (1 << 5); /* Set transmit status. */
> +            /* fallthrough */
>          case 17 ... 28:
>              if (s->mode & 0x01) { /* Reset mode */
>                  if (addr < 24) {
> @@ -620,6 +621,7 @@ void can_sja_mem_write(CanSJA1000State *s, hwaddr addr, 
> uint64_t val,
>              break;
>          case 10:
>              s->status_bas |= (1 << 5); /* Set transmit status. */
> +            /* fallthrough */
>          case 11 ... 19:
>              if ((s->control & 0x01) == 0) { /* Operation mode */
>                  s->tx_buff[addr - 10] = val; /* Store to TX buffer directly. 
> */
> 

cc: Pavel Pisa <p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>

Reply via email to