Hi Cédric, On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:35 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote: > On 6/22/20 8:49 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > > On 6/21/20 12:58 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >> We have 2 distinct PCA9552 devices. Set their description > >> to distinguish them when looking at the trace events. > > > > It's nice and usefull but couldn't we do the same with a QOM object name ? > > qdev inherits QOM and overloads it with the qdev_ API. > Since we have a qdev object, isn't it better to use the qdev_ API? > > I'd keep the QOM API for bare QOM objects.(I find confusing to use > different APIs).
FYI you can get an idea of the QOM -> qdev -> sysbus -> ... tree here: https://observablehq.com/@philmd/qemu-aarch64-softmmu-qom-tree
