We have a qemu internal abstraction layer on FDT. While I'm not fully convinced
we need it at all, it's missing the nop_node functionality that we now need
on e500. So let's add it and think about the general future of that API later.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
---
device_tree.c | 11 +++++++++++
device_tree.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/device_tree.c b/device_tree.c
index f5d5eb1..ec79dba 100644
--- a/device_tree.c
+++ b/device_tree.c
@@ -107,3 +107,14 @@ int qemu_devtree_setprop_string(void *fdt, const char
*node_path,
return fdt_setprop_string(fdt, offset, property, string);
}
+
+int qemu_devtree_nop_node(void *fdt, const char *node_path)
+{
+ int offset;
+
+ offset = fdt_path_offset(fdt, node_path);
+ if (offset < 0)
+ return offset;
+
+ return fdt_nop_node(fdt, offset);
+}
diff --git a/device_tree.h b/device_tree.h
index cecd98f..76fce5f 100644
--- a/device_tree.h
+++ b/device_tree.h
@@ -22,5 +22,6 @@ int qemu_devtree_setprop_cell(void *fdt, const char
*node_path,
const char *property, uint32_t val);
int qemu_devtree_setprop_string(void *fdt, const char *node_path,
const char *property, const char *string);
+int qemu_devtree_nop_node(void *fdt, const char *node_path);
#endif /* __DEVICE_TREE_H__ */
--
1.6.0.2
