Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes:

> We have a number of container images in tests/docker/dockerfiles
> that are intended to provide well defined environments for doing
> test builds. We want our CI system to use these containers too.
>
> This introduces builds of all of them as the first stage in the
> CI, so that the built containers are available for later build
> jobs. The containers are setup to use the GitLab container
> registry as the cache, so we only pay the penalty of the full
> build when the dockerfiles change. The main qemu-project/qemu
> repo is used as a second cache, so that users forking QEMU will
> see a fast turnaround time on their CI jobs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  .gitlab-ci.yml              |   3 +
>  2 files changed, 251 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 .gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
>
> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..ea1edbb196
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
> @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
> +
> +
> +.container_job_template: &container_job_definition
> +  image: docker:stable
> +  stage: containers
> +  services:
> +    - docker:dind
> +  before_script:
> +    - export TAG="$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE/ci-$NAME:latest"
> +    - export
> COMMON_TAG="$CI_REGISTRY/qemu-project/qemu/ci-$NAME:latest"

It would be nice if we could keep the same form as they have in the
local registry which would make it easier to integrate with the rest of
the tooling, e.g. "$CI_REGISTRY/qemu-project/qemu:$NAME"

Otherwise it looks good:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>


-- 
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to