On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > Nested KVM-HV only works on POWER9. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
Hrm. I have mixed feelings about this. It does bring forward an
error that we'd otherwise only discover when we try to load the kvm
module in the guest.
On the other hand, it's kind of a layering violation - really it's
KVM's business to report what it can and can't do, rather than having
qemu anticipate it.
Allowing POWER8 compat for an L2 is something we hope to have in the
fairly near future. Allowing POWER8 compat for L1, which is what this
covers, is, I'll admit, likely to never happen.
> ---
> HW/ppc/spapr_caps.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
> index 27cf2b38af27..dfe3b419daaa 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
> @@ -391,6 +391,8 @@ static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState
> *spapr,
> uint8_t val, Error **errp)
> {
> ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE();
> + PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
> +
> if (!val) {
> /* capability disabled by default */
> return;
> @@ -400,6 +402,14 @@ static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState
> *spapr,
> error_setg(errp, "No Nested KVM-HV support in TCG");
> error_append_hint(errp, "Try appending -machine
> cap-nested-hv=off\n");
> } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> + if (!ppc_check_compat(cpu, CPU_POWERPC_LOGICAL_3_00, 0,
> + spapr->max_compat_pvr)) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9");
> + error_append_hint(errp,
> + "Try appending -machine
> max-cpu-compat=power9\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (!kvmppc_has_cap_nested_kvm_hv()) {
> error_setg(errp,
> "KVM implementation does not support Nested KVM-HV");
>
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
