Some comments on patchew output:
On 5/26/20 12:58 AM, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200525145440.29728-1-cfont...@suse.de/
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> more information:
>
> Message-id: 20200525145440.29728-1-cfont...@suse.de
> Subject: [RFC v3 0/4] QEMU cpus.c refactoring
> Type: series
>
> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> #!/bin/bash
> git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0
> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
> git config --local diff.renames True
> git config --local diff.algorithm histogram
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base..
> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
>
> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
> - [tag update] patchew/20200525111001.8147-1-f4...@amsat.org ->
> patchew/20200525111001.8147-1-f4...@amsat.org
> Switched to a new branch 'test'
> 0f5db0e cpus: extract out accel-specific code to each accel
> 1b135cf cpu-timers, icount: new modules
> cb5c834 cpu-throttle: new module, extracted from cpus.c
> 3d5a04d softmmu: move softmmu only files from root
>
> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> 1/4 Checking commit 3d5a04d99492 (softmmu: move softmmu only files from root)
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #112:
> rename from arch_init.c
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 77 lines checked
I am not sure who the maintainer of arch_init would be.
get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found, printing recent contributors.
>
> Patch 1/4 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> 2/4 Checking commit cb5c834770dd (cpu-throttle: new module, extracted from
> cpus.c)
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #110:
> new file mode 100644
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 386 lines checked
I assumed this would be Paolo, since he maintains related components (and the
cpus.c it came from)
>
> Patch 2/4 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> 3/4 Checking commit 1b135cfa40c8 (cpu-timers, icount: new modules)
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #94: FILE: accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:107:
> + qemu_printf("Warning: The guest is now late by %.1f to %.1f
> seconds\n",
Here I would ignore the warning for the benefit of readability of the printf
string.
>
> ERROR: line over 90 characters
> #265: FILE: hw/core/ptimer.c:137:
> + if (s->enabled == 1 && (delta * period < 10000) && !icount_enabled() &&
> !qtest_enabled()) {
this I should fix
>
> ERROR: line over 90 characters
> #274: FILE: hw/core/ptimer.c:220:
> + if (!oneshot && (s->delta * period < 10000) && !icount_enabled()
> && !qtest_enabled()) {
>
this I should fix
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #384:
> new file mode 100644
>
> total: 2 errors, 2 warnings, 2331 lines checked
>
> Patch 3/4 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
> 4/4 Checking commit 0f5db0e76127 (cpus: extract out accel-specific code to
> each accel)
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #86:
> new file mode 100644
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 2463 lines checked
>
> Patch 4/4 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> === OUTPUT END ===
I am adding the new accelerator interfaces to the respective accelerator
maintainers.
>
> Test command exited with code: 1
>
>
> The full log is available at
> http://patchew.org/logs/20200525145440.29728-1-cfont...@suse.de/testing.checkpatch/?type=message.
> ---
> Email generated automatically by Patchew [https://patchew.org/].
> Please send your feedback to patchew-de...@redhat.com
>
