On 5/18/20 7:46 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.05.20 00:20, Collin Walling wrote:
>> The SCCB must be checked for a sufficient length before it is filled
>> with any data. If the length is insufficient, then the SCLP command
>> is suppressed and the proper response code is set in the SCCB header.
>>
>> Fixes: 832be0d8a3bb ("s390x: sclp: Report insufficient SCCB length")
>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> index 61e2e2839c..2bd618515e 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
>> int rnsize, rnmax;
>> IplParameterBlock *ipib = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
>>
>> + if (be16_to_cpu(sccb->h.length) < (sizeof(ReadInfo) + cpu_count *
>> sizeof(CPUEntry))) {
>> + sccb->h.response_code =
>> cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INSUFFICIENT_SCCB_LENGTH);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>
> (replied to v1 by mistake)
>
> Lines too long.
>
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl before submitting.
>
I do. The changes in this patch are replaced by the #3. I opted to be
sloppy here for ease of readability.
But if it's truly an issue I can clean it up for next round.
--
--
Regards,
Collin
Stay safe and stay healthy
