On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Luiz Capitulino wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:39:07 +0200
> Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> 
> > Am 13.07.2011 18:27, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:04:52 +0100
> > > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 13 July 2011 15:23, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>> diff --git a/compiler.h b/compiler.h
> > >>> new file mode 100644
> > >>> index 0000000..2dfc2c6
> > >>> --- /dev/null
> > >>> +++ b/compiler.h
> > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > >>> +#ifndef COMPILER_H
> > >>> +#define COMPILER_H
> > >>
> > >> If we don't have a rule that says that all new source files should have
> > >> a standard-ish format copyright notice and license statement, I think
> > >> we ought to.
> > >
> > > Make sense, but this content comes from qemu-common.h which doesn't
> > > have that information. I can't choose for the authors. Malc is one of 
> > > them,
> > > and he asked me to remove the license text altogether (which makes 
> > > this public
> > > domain?)
> > 
> > Malc's code was from audio/audio_int.h, so maybe the license text
> > can be copied from that file.
> 
> Malc, are you ok with that?
> 

I would be okay with just making it public domain.

-- 
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru

Reply via email to