Hi Prasad,
On Thursday, 2020-05-14 at 00:55:38 +0530, P J P wrote:
> From: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org>
>
> A guest user may set 'reply_queue_head' field of MegasasState to
> a negative value. Later in 'megasas_lookup_frame' it is used to
> index into s->frames[] array. Use unsigned type to avoid OOB
> access issue.
>
> Also check that 'index' value stays within s->frames[] bounds
> through the while() loop in 'megasas_lookup_frame' to avoid OOB
> access.
>
> Reported-by: Ren Ding <rd...@gatech.edu>
> Reported-by: Hanqing Zhao <hanq...@gatech.edu>
> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alx...@bu.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org>
> ---
> hw/scsi/megasas.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Update v1 -> v2: fix OOB access when index > MEGASAS_MAX_FRAMES(=2048)
> -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg03131.html
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/megasas.c b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> index af18c88b65..6ce598cd69 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ typedef struct MegasasState {
> uint64_t reply_queue_pa;
> void *reply_queue;
> int reply_queue_len;
> - int reply_queue_head;
> + uint16_t reply_queue_head;
> int reply_queue_tail;
> uint64_t consumer_pa;
> uint64_t producer_pa;
> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static MegasasCmd *megasas_lookup_frame(MegasasState *s,
>
> index = s->reply_queue_head;
While it is probably unlikely that it would cause an integer underflow
here, for consistency, index probably should also be declared as
unsigned, but from what I can tell it is still an 'int'.
Thanks,
Darren.
>
> - while (num < s->fw_cmds) {
> + while (num < s->fw_cmds && index < MEGASAS_MAX_FRAMES) {
> if (s->frames[index].pa && s->frames[index].pa == frame) {
> cmd = &s->frames[index];
> break;
> --
> 2.25.4
