Yes, exactly what happened when loading a non-trivial binary. :-( Oh well.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 07/12/2011 09:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > For now, just force the mapping to somewhere mappable :) > > Unfortunately, I can tell you that there is no such place. > > The text segment is mapped by default at 0x4000000000000000 > and the data segment is by default mapped at 0x6000000000000000. > > If you set guest_base = 0xc000000000000000, which remaps > the text segment to 0, then the data segment will still be > at 0x2000000000000000, which x86_64 still cannot represent. > > If you hack the address mapping routines to simply drop the > high bits, then the text and data segments will map on top > of one another. You can well imagine how well that will work. > > The *only* way to solve this is with softmmu. > > > r~ >
