On Tue,  5 May 2020 17:29:17 +0200
Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Both s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256].name and
> s390_features[S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256].name is
> "pcc-cmac-eaes-256".  The former is obviously a pasto.
> 
> Impact:
> 
> * s390_feat_bitmap_to_ascii() misidentifies S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256
>   as "pcc-cmac-eaes-256".  Affects QMP commands query-cpu-definitions,
>   query-cpu-model-expansion, query-cpu-model-baseline,
>   query-cpu-model-comparison, and the error message when
>   s390_realize_cpu_model() fails in check_compatibility().
> 
> * s390_cpu_list() also misidentifies it.  Affects -cpu help.
> 
> * s390_cpu_model_register_props() creates CPU property
>   "pcc-cmac-eaes-256" twice.  The second one fails, but the error is
>   ignored (a later commit will change that).  Results in a single
>   property "pcc-cmac-eaes-256" with the description for
>   S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_AES_256, and no property for
>   S390_FEAT_PCC_CMAC_EAES_256.  CPU properties are visible in CLI -cpu
>   and -device, QMP & HMP device_add, QMP device-list-properties, and
>   QOM introspection.
> 
> Fix by deleting the wayward 'e'.
> 
> Fixes: 782417446279717aa85320191a519b51f6d5dd31

I like the more standard

Fixes: 782417446279 ("s390x/cpumodel: introduce CPU features")

for that.

> Cc: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Cc: qemu-s3...@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>

I assume you'll take this one together with the rest of the series?


Reply via email to