From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> Hi,
Laurent reported hitting the assert in access_el3_aa32ns() when accessing 32-bit versions of some of the virtualization regs when EL3 is 64-bit. I think we got this wrong back then and it seems to me like we should remove direct usage of access_el3_aa32ns() and always call access_el3_aa32ns_aa64_any() to handle both the aa32-only cases and the mixed aa32/aa64. Cheers, Edgar ChangeLog: v1 -> v2: * Keep access_el3_aa32ns in favor of access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any * Simplify description of access_el3_aa32ns * Tweak secure aa32-el3 check in access_el3_aa32ns as suggested by Peter Edgar E. Iglesias (1): target/arm: Drop access_el3_aa32ns() target/arm/helper.c | 30 +++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1
