On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 8:11 AM David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 27.04.20 17:08, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:15 AM David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> There is only one wrong comment remaining I think. Something like
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> >> index a1d6fb52c8..1b2127c04c 100644
> >> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> >> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> >> @@ -554,8 +554,8 @@ static void
> >> virtio_balloon_free_page_stop(VirtIOBalloon *s)
> >> */
> >> qemu_mutex_lock(&s->free_page_lock);
> >> /*
> >> - * The guest hasn't done the reporting, so host sends a
> >> notification
> >> - * to the guest to actively stop the reporting.
> >> + * The guest isn't done with hinting, so the host sends a
> >> notification
> >> + * to the guest to actively stop the hinting.
> >
> > I'll probably tweak it slightly and drop the "with". So the comment will
> > read:
> > /*
> > * The guest isn't done hinting, so host sends a notification
>
> I always feel like "so host sends" sounds wrong ("the host"). But I am
> not a native speaker.
Actually it might read better to get rid of "the host" entirely to
make it more of an imperative statement rather than a declarative one.
Maybe something more like:
/*
* The guest isn't done hinting, so send a notification
* to the guest to actively stop the hinting.
*/
