On 11/04/20 20:29, Peter Maydell wrote: > > I've marked this up as 'for-5.0?' because I think it would be > nice if at least patch 1 went in. Patch 2 seems uncontroversial > (though I guess we should forward it up to the kernel folks > since kernel-doc is from them originally). Patch 3 is the > expedient change, but you could argue about whether this is > the best way to tell kernel-doc what to do.
I agree---I would say this is ok for 5.0 as long as the last two patches are forwarded to the kernel and any changes integrated back. Patch 1 is clever. :) Paolo > > thanks > -- PMM > > Peter Maydell (3): > configure: Honour --disable-werror for Sphinx > scripts/kernel-doc: Add missing close-paren in c:function directives > kernel-doc: Use c:struct for Sphinx 3.0 and later
