> On 31 Mar 2020, at 15:07, Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Thanks for declaring my workflow irrelevant, I guess... Sorry if this happened, it was not intended. The intention was to point out that there are also other use cases of running the QEMU builds, different from those specific to building Linux distribution packages. Given the large number of libraries and tools that the xPack Build Box workflow supports, it is no surprise that it accepts both out of tree and in tree builds. Just that for a large project like QEMU, since I usually run a multi-platform build at once, having multiple copies of QEMU in each platform build folder would be less space efficient than having a single copy in the folder with common sources. Apart from this, I actually don't mind, you can choose whatever solution you want, I guess I can accommodate it somehow. Regards, Liviu
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Daniel P . Berrangé
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Kevin Wolf
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Michal Suchánek
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Daniel P . Berrangé
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds BALATON Zoltan
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Paolo Bonzini
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Liviu Ionescu
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Peter Maydell
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Liviu Ionescu
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Kevin Wolf
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Liviu Ionescu
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Kevin Wolf
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Peter Maydell
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Kevin Wolf
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Peter Maydell
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Eric Blake
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds BALATON Zoltan
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Kevin Wolf
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds BALATON Zoltan
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Aleksandar Markovic
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds Markus Armbruster