On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:16:21 -0400
Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:12:59AM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:50:47 -0400
> > Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:53:47AM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:  
> > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:51:31 -0400
> > > > Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:49:21PM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:    
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On 3/30/2020 8:54 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:      
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:28:13PM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:   
> > > > > > >    
> > > > > > >> Hit send button little early.
> > > > > > >>      
> > > > > > >>   >
> > > > > > >>   > I checked v12, it's not like what I said.
> > > > > > >>   > In v12, bitmaps are generated per vfio_dma, and combination 
> > > > > > >> of the
> > > > > > >>   > bitmaps are required in order to generate a big bitmap 
> > > > > > >> suiting for dirty
> > > > > > >>   > query. It can cause problem when offset not aligning.
> > > > > > >>   > But what I propose here is to generate an rb tree orthogonal 
> > > > > > >> to the tree
> > > > > > >>   > of vfio_dma.
> > > > > > >>   >
> > > > > > >>   > as to CPU cycles saving, I don't think iterating/translating 
> > > > > > >> page by page
> > > > > > >>   > would achieve that purpose.
> > > > > > >>   >      
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Instead of creating one extra rb tree for dirty pages tracking 
> > > > > > >> in v10
> > > > > > >> tried to use dma->pfn_list itself, we tried changes in v10, v11 
> > > > > > >> and v12,
> > > > > > >> latest version is evolved version with best possible approach 
> > > > > > >> after
> > > > > > >> discussion. Probably, go through v11 as well.
> > > > > > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11298335/
> > > > > > >>      
> > > > > > > I'm not sure why all those previous implementations are bound to
> > > > > > > vfio_dma. for vIOMMU on, in most cases, a vfio_dma is only for a 
> > > > > > > page,
> > > > > > > so generating a one-byte bitmap for a single page in each 
> > > > > > > vfio_dma ?
> > > > > > > is it possible to creating one extra rb tree to keep dirty 
> > > > > > > ranges, and
> > > > > > > one fixed length kernel bitmap whose content is generated on 
> > > > > > > query,
> > > > > > > serving as a bouncing buffer for copy_to_user
> > > > > > >       
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > One fixed length? what should be fixed value? then isn't it better 
> > > > > > to 
> > > > > > fix the size to dma->size?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is also to prevent DoS attack, user space application can 
> > > > > > query a 
> > > > > > very large range.
> > > > > >       
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 3/27/2020 6:00 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:      
> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:39:01AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote: 
> > > > > > >>>      
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On 3/25/2020 7:41 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:      
> > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:18:52AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede 
> > > > > > >>>>> wrote:      
> > > > > > >>>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES ioctl performs three operations:
> > > > > > >>>>>> - Start dirty pages tracking while migration is active
> > > > > > >>>>>> - Stop dirty pages tracking.
> > > > > > >>>>>> - Get dirty pages bitmap. Its user space application's 
> > > > > > >>>>>> responsibility to
> > > > > > >>>>>>      copy content of dirty pages from source to destination 
> > > > > > >>>>>> during migration.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> To prevent DoS attack, memory for bitmap is allocated per 
> > > > > > >>>>>> vfio_dma
> > > > > > >>>>>> structure. Bitmap size is calculated considering smallest 
> > > > > > >>>>>> supported page
> > > > > > >>>>>> size. Bitmap is allocated for all vfio_dmas when dirty 
> > > > > > >>>>>> logging is enabled
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Bitmap is populated for already pinned pages when bitmap is 
> > > > > > >>>>>> allocated for
> > > > > > >>>>>> a vfio_dma with the smallest supported page size. Update 
> > > > > > >>>>>> bitmap from
> > > > > > >>>>>> pinning functions when tracking is enabled. When user 
> > > > > > >>>>>> application queries
> > > > > > >>>>>> bitmap, check if requested page size is same as page size 
> > > > > > >>>>>> used to
> > > > > > >>>>>> populated bitmap. If it is equal, copy bitmap, but if not 
> > > > > > >>>>>> equal, return
> > > > > > >>>>>> error.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankh...@nvidia.com>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <c...@nvidia.com>
> > > > > > >>>>>> ---
> > > > > > >>>>>>     drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 266 
> > > > > > >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > > >>>>>>     1 file changed, 260 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c 
> > > > > > >>>>>> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > > > > >>>>>> index 70aeab921d0f..874a1a7ae925 100644
> > > > > > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > > > > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > > > > >>>>>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
> > > > > > >>>>>>      unsigned int            dma_avail;
> > > > > > >>>>>>      bool                    v2;
> > > > > > >>>>>>      bool                    nesting;
> > > > > > >>>>>> +    bool                    dirty_page_tracking;
> > > > > > >>>>>>     };
> > > > > > >>>>>>     
> > > > > > >>>>>>     struct vfio_domain {
> > > > > > >>>>>> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ struct vfio_dma {
> > > > > > >>>>>>      bool                    lock_cap;       /* 
> > > > > > >>>>>> capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) */
> > > > > > >>>>>>      struct task_struct      *task;
> > > > > > >>>>>>      struct rb_root          pfn_list;       /* Ex-user 
> > > > > > >>>>>> pinned pfn list */
> > > > > > >>>>>> +    unsigned long           *bitmap;
> > > > > > >>>>>>     };
> > > > > > >>>>>>     
> > > > > > >>>>>>     struct vfio_group {
> > > > > > >>>>>> @@ -125,7 +127,21 @@ struct vfio_regions {
> > > > > > >>>>>>     #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)  \
> > > > > > >>>>>>                                      
> > > > > > >>>>>> (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
> > > > > > >>>>>>     
> > > > > > >>>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)       (ALIGN(n, 
> > > > > > >>>>>> BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
> > > > > > >>>>>> +
> > > > > > >>>>>> +/*
> > > > > > >>>>>> + * Input argument of number of bits to bitmap_set() is 
> > > > > > >>>>>> unsigned integer, which
> > > > > > >>>>>> + * further casts to signed integer for unaligned multi-bit 
> > > > > > >>>>>> operation,
> > > > > > >>>>>> + * __bitmap_set().
> > > > > > >>>>>> + * Then maximum bitmap size supported is 2^31 bits divided 
> > > > > > >>>>>> by 2^3 bits/byte,
> > > > > > >>>>>> + * that is 2^28 (256 MB) which maps to 2^31 * 2^12 = 2^43 
> > > > > > >>>>>> (8TB) on 4K page
> > > > > > >>>>>> + * system.
> > > > > > >>>>>> + */
> > > > > > >>>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX      (uint64_t)(INT_MAX - 1)
> > > > > > >>>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_SIZE_MAX        
> > > > > > >>>>>> DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
> > > > > > >>>>>> +
> > > > > > >>>>>>     static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
> > > > > > >>>>>> +static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu 
> > > > > > >>>>>> *iommu);
> > > > > > >>>>>>     
> > > > > > >>>>>>     /*
> > > > > > >>>>>>      * This code handles mapping and unmapping of user data 
> > > > > > >>>>>> buffers
> > > > > > >>>>>> @@ -175,6 +191,77 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct 
> > > > > > >>>>>> vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
> > > > > > >>>>>>      rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
> > > > > > >>>>>>     }
> > > > > > >>>>>>     
> > > > > > >>>>>> +
> > > > > > >>>>>> +static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_dma *dma, 
> > > > > > >>>>>> uint64_t pgsize)
> > > > > > >>>>>> +{
> > > > > > >>>>>> +    uint64_t npages = dma->size / pgsize;
> > > > > > >>>>>> +      
> > > > > > > If pgsize > dma->size, npages = 0.
> > > > > > > wouldn't it cause problem?
> > > > > > >       
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This patch-set supports bitmap for smallest supported page size, 
> > > > > > i.e. 
> > > > > > PAGE_SIZE. vfio_dma_do_map() validates dma->size accordingly. So 
> > > > > > this 
> > > > > > case will not happen.
> > > > > >       
> > > > > as far as I know, qemu/kvm uses 4k as the unit for dirty page 
> > > > > tracking.
> > > > > so why smallest iommu page size is used here?
> > > > > wouldn't it cause problem?    
> > > > 
> > > > If your concern is that the IOMMU supports sub-4K page sizes, see
> > > > vfio_pgsize_bitmap().  We actually only support PAGE_SIZE as our
> > > > minimum mapping unit, even if the IOMMU supports less, so PAGE_SIZE is
> > > > our lower bound.  Thanks,    
> > > 
> > > if we always uses PAGE_SIZE, why not use PAGE_SIZE directly?
> > > or returning dirty bitmap unit (e.g. 1 << 
> > > __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu)))
> > > to QEMU in VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START, so that qemu can do possible
> > > conversion if it's not the same unit that QEMU uses.  
> > 
> > The vfio interface is essentially just an extension of the IOMMU API
> > via domain->pgsize_bitmap.  intel-iommu mostly made the bitmask
> > meaningless by reporting essentially PAGE_MASK, and we just expose the
> > common version of that across potentially all the IOMMUs used by the
> > domain, modulo minimum of PAGE_SIZE.  Thanks,  
> 
> ok. got it. do you think it's good to return this iommu page size
> when turning on dirty page tracking? so when GET_BITMAP ioctl
> comes, we don't need to quit if range.bitmap.pgsize != iommu_pgsize.
> instead, the GET_BITMAP can success with iommu page size and qemu does
> the bitmap conversion afterwards.

The bitmap is already expose to the user via
vfio_iommu_type1_info.iova_pgsizes in the VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO ioctl.
Our original intention was to allow the user to specify the dirty
bitmap page size, which is still enabled in the ioctl via
bitmap.pgsize, but for simplification we currently only support the
smallest page size.  This could be something else we expose via the
extension interface when more page sizes are supported.  Thanks,

Alex


Reply via email to