From: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> We are not short of numbers for EXCP_*. There is no need to confuse things by having EXCP_VMEXIT and EXCP_SYSCALL overlap, even though the former is only used for system mode and the latter is only used for user mode.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20200213032223.14643-2-richard.hender...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> --- target/i386/cpu.h | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h index 576f309bbfc8..08b4422f36bd 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.h +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h @@ -999,9 +999,8 @@ typedef uint64_t FeatureWordArray[FEATURE_WORDS]; #define EXCP11_ALGN 17 #define EXCP12_MCHK 18 -#define EXCP_SYSCALL 0x100 /* only happens in user only emulation - for syscall instruction */ -#define EXCP_VMEXIT 0x100 +#define EXCP_VMEXIT 0x100 /* only for system emulation */ +#define EXCP_SYSCALL 0x101 /* only for user emulation */ /* i386-specific interrupt pending bits. */ #define CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_1 -- 2.25.1
