From: Felipe Franciosi <fel...@nutanix.com> When QOM APIs were added to ich9 in 6f1426ab, the getter for sci_int was written using uint32_t. However, the object property is uint8_t. This fixes the getter for correctness.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <fel...@nutanix.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c index d8186f5..2471463 100644 --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c @@ -629,9 +629,7 @@ static void ich9_lpc_get_sci_int(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp) { ICH9LPCState *lpc = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(obj); - uint32_t value = lpc->sci_gsi; - - visit_type_uint32(v, name, &value, errp); + visit_type_uint8(v, name, &lpc->sci_gsi, errp); } static void ich9_lpc_add_properties(ICH9LPCState *lpc) @@ -639,7 +637,7 @@ static void ich9_lpc_add_properties(ICH9LPCState *lpc) static const uint8_t acpi_enable_cmd = ICH9_APM_ACPI_ENABLE; static const uint8_t acpi_disable_cmd = ICH9_APM_ACPI_DISABLE; - object_property_add(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_SCI_INT, "uint32", + object_property_add(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_SCI_INT, "uint8", ich9_lpc_get_sci_int, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL); object_property_add_uint8_ptr(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_ACPI_ENABLE_CMD, -- 1.8.3.1