On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:54 AM Rajnesh Kanwal
<rajnesh.kanwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is the link to the patch
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-riscv/2020-01/msg00191.html
Ah, it doesn't look like it made it to the QEMU-devel list. Can you
re-send it to QEMU-devel?
Alistair
>
> -Rajnesh
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:06 AM Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jose Martins <josemartin...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello rajnesh,
>> >
>> > I had already submitted almost this exact patch a few weeks ago.
>>
>> To QEMU? I don't see the patch.
>>
>> Alistair
>>
>> >
>> > Jose
>> >
>> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 13:51, <rajnesh.kanwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: Rajnesh Kanwal <rajnesh.kanwa...@gmail.com>
>> > >
>> > > Currently riscv_cpu_local_irq_pending is used to find out pending
>> > > interrupt and VS mode interrupts are being shifted to represent
>> > > S mode interrupts in this function. So when the cause returned by
>> > > this function is passed to riscv_cpu_do_interrupt to actually
>> > > forward the interrupt, the VS mode forwarding check does not work
>> > > as intended and interrupt is actually forwarded to hypervisor. This
>> > > patch fixes this issue.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Rajnesh Kanwal <rajnesh.kanwa...@gmail.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>> > > index b9e90dfd9a..59535ecba6 100644
>> > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>> > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>> > > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static int riscv_cpu_local_irq_pending(CPURISCVState
>> > > *env)
>> > > target_ulong pending = env->mip & env->mie &
>> > > ~(MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | MIP_VSEIP);
>> > > target_ulong vspending = (env->mip & env->mie &
>> > > - (MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | MIP_VSEIP)) >> 1;
>> > > + (MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | MIP_VSEIP));
>> > >
>> > > target_ulong mie = env->priv < PRV_M ||
>> > > (env->priv == PRV_M && mstatus_mie);
>> > > @@ -900,6 +900,13 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>> > >
>> > > if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env) && ((hdeleg >> cause) & 1)
>> > > &&
>> > > !force_hs_execp) {
>> > > + /*
>> > > + * See if we need to adjust cause. Yes if its VS mode
>> > > interrupt
>> > > + * no if hypervisor has delegated one of hs mode's
>> > > interrupt
>> > > + */
>> > > + if (cause == IRQ_VS_TIMER || cause == IRQ_VS_SOFT ||
>> > > + cause == IRQ_VS_EXT)
>> > > + cause = cause - 1;
>> > > /* Trap to VS mode */
>> > > } else if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env)) {
>> > > /* Trap into HS mode, from virt */
>> > > --
>> > > 2.17.1
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
