On 06/23/2011 02:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Alon Levy<al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:55:25PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
>> Goal:
>>
>> Provide a mechanism, similar to vmware and virtualbox guest tools
>> ISOs, that allows us to easily distribute guest tools (and
>> potentially drivers) for linux and windows guests.
>
> What would be the advantage for linux guests, with their package managers
already
> handling this task? I see how it would make testing easier with various linux
> distributions, but for management I wonder if it won't be easier to use the
> package management system to update the guests same as the hosts.
If the guest tools come from the host QEMU we don't need complicated
compatibility testing and fallbacks. Guest and host will be in sync
and support the same features.
Even building the tools would be very hard. In general if you build
against libc version y, you cannot expect your code to work against libc
version y-1, unless you take special measures. With other libraries the
"special measures" may not even be possible.
(I'm assuming statically linking the binaries is out of the question)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
