On 26.02.20 04:30, Pan Nengyuan wrote: > collect_image_check() is called twice in img_check(), the filename/format > will be alloced without free the original memory. > It is not a big deal since the process will exit anyway, but seems like a > clean code and it will remove the warning spotted by asan. > > Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.ro...@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengy...@huawei.com> > --- > qemu-img.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I think this should happen in the caller. And there I think it would make more sense to completely discard the old object and allocate a new one: qapi_free_ImageCheck(check); check = g_new0(ImageCheck, 1); This way, we can’t forget to free any fields if new pointers were to be added to the ImageCheck object. Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature