On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 19:10, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > This could go in independently. It would make Kashyap's series > conflict, but I have already rebased it on top.
I'm happy to collect up 'docs' patches for pullreqs (and fix up conflicts etc as they arise) if that helps in getting things into the tree. I feel like we're working a bit at cross purposes here so maybe we'd benefit from just nailing down who's going to do what and in which order? My current thought on ordering is something like: * commit this * commit Kashyap's series * commit (an adjusted version of) your split-out-the-texi series * (automated) conversion of more texi -- all in one series I guess ? * ??? * profit but I'm not very strongly attached to that. > Perhaps we could have the files in both .texi and (automatically > converted) .rst versions at the same time in the tree for a short > period. If that's okay for you, I can post tomorrow a series to do that. My instinct is to say that that's a bit dangerous as it means we might end up with changes to the "wrong" version of the two files. Would it let us do the conversion faster or more conveniently ? thanks -- PMM
