On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:56 PM Yoshinori Sato
<ys...@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:51:30 +0900,
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >
> > On 2/23/20 2:27 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ys...@users.sourceforge.jp>
> > > ---
> > > hw/rx/rx-virt.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/rx/rx-virt.c b/hw/rx/rx-virt.c
> > > index 6cf7936201..4ee6647728 100644
> > > --- a/hw/rx/rx-virt.c
> > > +++ b/hw/rx/rx-virt.c
> > > @@ -90,8 +90,10 @@ static void rxvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> > > /* Load kernel and dtb */
> > > if (kernel_filename) {
> > > - /* The kernel image is loaded into
> > > - the latter half of the SDRAM space. */
> > > + /*
> > > + The kernel image is loaded into
> > > + the latter half of the SDRAM space.
> > > + */
> > > kernel_offset = machine->ram_size / 2;
> > > rx_load_image(RXCPU(first_cpu), kernel_filename,
> > > SDRAM_BASE + kernel_offset, kernel_offset);
> > >
> >
> > Hopefully the maintainer taking this can squash this fix to patch #17
> > "hw/rx: RX Target hardware definition".
> >
>
> Oh, Sorry.
> I'll sent v23.
No please don't! This is not needed.
