On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:35:12PM +0800, Yubo Miao wrote:
> From: miaoyubo <miaoy...@huawei.com>
>
> Currently, pxb-pcie could be defined by the cmdline like
> --device pxb-pcie,id=pci.9,bus_nr=128
> However pxb-pcie is not described in acpi tables for arm.
>
> The formal two patches support pxb-pcie for arm, escpcially the
> specification for pxb-pcie in DSDT table.
>
> Add a testcase to make sure the ACPI table is correct for guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: miaoyubo <miaoy...@huawei.com>
Please look at the top of tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
for how to add or update tests.
> ---
> tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb | Bin 0 -> 34209 bytes
> tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb
>
> diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb b/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4eea3192c75ff28f7054d626a9363ca025b6c0ad
> GIT binary patch
I can't read this.
> literal 34209
> zcmeI*cXU+szJ~D)1PGxe5PG+us9-{<Do8R35G4>YGz}UAMT!L#ks?x*Dx!d5hoIPd
> z?}}o>iWL;GW5HgrlKbvVM&HM??^)~qbMIProvd|8p2_U*%qO!m?AgcPkRQ(<wr)WX
> zR3DKyBsMVKK5tZUEMJ#Z3xXj0I{cizY-H-_vUpxu>HL<ltgNimvVn#9^>bszg^Hd*
> zYT59@{GfDxK}u{$QSzH5MFX?4va_qcnOYVriD$G-YqqdX5KgQUqzA#0T0ymH9aJ-P
> zt=#;Qdf_)p=V$jH6t9{xXmH68P3ev)8EFlwrs(=X$_(9dxJh>6UU8FZi5vcVla%Bp
> zz50)g^-pXvw4i9XAYFAU@nN}Xb+t___n%u<uhU$chBua*GNL5;Gf3Q8mfgX>w)`8L
> z7F4goX88!*;pB+$X8&bG_2BOj*;OO*!h6xx&B+mI)uU#l*o>||BPVi3ji?#5Y(|dH
> z=oUF6C2B^h&FJPcx<}5a88su#W_0%%JtAk+ikeZ+X7unGJtJq-j+)WHX7uzKy&`9%
...
