On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:06:24 +0100 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2/19/20 2:00 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:51:34 +0100 > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2/17/20 6:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >>> Follow up patches will remove automatic RAM distribution > >>> between nodes and will make default machine types require > >>> "memdev" option instead of legacy "mem" option. > >> > >> Can we keep this patch for the follow up? > > memdev for numa was there for along time, just untested. > > With this all numa tests switch to it instead of using > > legacy option (+ a test for legacy option). > > I don't think the patch should delayed along with numa > > cleanups. > > I guess what confuses me is "Follow up patches *will* remove..." I'll drop this frase since there aren't immediate "Follow up patches" to avoid confusion > > > > It of-cause could be posted as standalone patch as well, > > I'll leave it upto Paolo whether to merge it or not. > > > >>> > >>> Make tests to follow new rules and add an additional test > >>> for legacy "mem" option on old machine type, to make sure > >>> it won't regress in the future. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> > >>> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > >>> --- > >> > > >
