On 18.06.2011, at 13:15, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 18.06.2011 um 00:59 schrieb Alexander Graf: > >> On 17.06.2011, at 21:34, Andreas Färber wrote: >> >>> Am 17.06.2011 um 16:43 schrieb Alexander Graf: >>> >>>> From: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org> >>>> >>>> On at least the PowerPC 601, a direct-store (T=1) with bus unit ID 0x07F >>>> is special-cased as memory-forced I/O controller access. It is supposed >>>> to be checked immediately if T=1, bypassing all protection mechanisms >>>> and acting cache-inhibited and global. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org> >>>> >>>> Simplified by avoiding reindentation. Added explanatory comments. >>>> >>>> Cc: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> >>> >>> Feel free to remove the Cc: after adding a corresponding Sob or similar >>> line. >> >> Hrm - I usually just use git am -s for the sob line. If you find the CC >> irritating, please just pass it to git send-email --cc and omit it from the >> patch. It's more or less unuseful information anyways :) > > Ah, didn't know that option. I always used git am, followed by git commit > --amend -s, at which point one can edit the commit message.
I see - that's pretty annoying when it comes to applying patch sets though, no? :) > --cc becomes unhandy in a series of ~35, when not all patches concern > everyone and to avoid forgetting CCs. That's where taste differs :). Avi usually even drops the automatic CCs and manually adds --cc for the whole patch set to people it concerns. I somewhat sympathize with this approach. Who wants patch 16/35 when he doesn't get all the others, especially not 00/35? I certainly prefer to get the full set in my inbox instead of just the patches that relate explicitly to me. Alex
