On 16 May 2011 18:51, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 16 May 2011 18:29, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: >> That said given this patch is more or less an extension of an existing >> code, we may want to apply it anyway. > > That is the conclusion I'm hoping to persuade you to, yes :-)
This patch seems to have got stuck in limbo -- any chance of a definite ack/nak-and-do-it-like-this/commit from anybody? [This bug is one of the items on my "ARM issues that must be fixed in some manner for 0.15 release".] thanks -- PMM
