On 28/01/2020 14.33, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote: > > On 1/28/20 11:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:55 PM Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: >>>> On 25/01/2020 19.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>>> The NAME variable can be used to describe nicely a job (see [*]). >>>>> As we currently have 32 jobs, use it. This helps for quickly >>>>> finding a particular job. >>>>> >>>>> before: https://travis-ci.org/qemu/qemu/builds/639887646 >>>>> after: https://travis-ci.org/philmd/qemu/builds/641795043 >>>> Very good idea, correlating a job in the GUI to an entry in the yml >>>> file >>>> was really a pain, so far. >>>> >>>>> [*] >>>>> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build/#naming-jobs-within-matrices >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> .travis.yml | 101 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >>>>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml >>>>> index 6c1038a0f1..d68e35a2c5 100644 >>>>> --- a/.travis.yml >>>>> +++ b/.travis.yml >>>>> @@ -94,24 +94,28 @@ after_script: >>>>> >>>>> matrix: >>>>> include: >>>>> - - env: >>>>> + - name: "[x86] GCC static (user)" >>>> Could you please drop the [x86] and other architectures from the names? >>>> Travis already lists the build architecture in the job status page, so >>>> this information is redundant. >>> Hmm for me the Travis page mis-renders the architecture (on firefox) so >>> I do find the arch in the text fairly handy. >> This might be a font problem, I can't see the architecture on neither >> Firefox nor Chrome: >> >> https://pasteboard.co/IS3O358.png > > > It is the partially hidden column between the job number and the penguin > (or apple if MacOS). > > Funny, I can see the arch on Philippe's dashboard > (https://travis-ci.org/philmd/qemu) but it disappears on my own > (https://travis-ci.org/wainersm/qemu).
I've never had problems here, for me the column shows up correctly everywhere. It looks like this: http://people.redhat.com/~thuth/travis.png > Anyway, most of the jobs run on x86_64. So perhaps mark only the non-x86 > ones? Sounds like a good compromise to me! Thomas
