On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:07:40 +0100 Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:41:45 +0100 > Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:39:25 +0100 > > Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote: [..] > > > > > > one should be able to use memory-backend property to make it work > > > instead of -m convenience option in s390 case. > > > > Thank you very much for the quick response! > > > > Honestly, I overlooked the memory-backed machine property, but regardless > > of that -machine,memory-backend=id *does not seem viable* at the > > moment. > > [..] > > > > Or, am I using it wrong? > > You right, > I even had an alternative impl. earlier that used string property > instead of link, but later I forgot about this complication > and simplified it to link property which works fine but only > for -m case. > > It's necessary to rewrite patches 2-4/80 to use string property > for memory-backend which will be used for delayed backend access > at machine_run_board_init() time. > > I'll CC you on relevant patches for reviewing when I post v4. > Thanks! I will give it a spin. Halil
