On 23.01.20 13:17, David Edmondson wrote: > On Tuesday, 2020-01-21 at 16:02:16 +01, Max Reitz wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 17.01.20 11:34, David Edmondson wrote:
[...]
>>> +
>>> + if (!s->has_zero_init && s->target_is_new && s->min_sparse &&
>>> + !s->target_has_backing) {
>>
>> (This will be irrelevant after target_has_backing is gone, but because
>> has_zero_init and target_has_backing are equivalent here, there is no
>> need to check both.)
>
> I don't understand this comment - I must be missing something.
Just the fact that for some reason I read “target_has_backing” as
“target_is_zero”. Sorry for the false alarm. O:-)
Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
