From: Xiao Yang <yangx...@cn.fujitsu.com> lo_copy_file_range() passes -errno to fuse_reply_err() and then fuse_reply_err() changes it to errno again, so that subsequent fuse_send_reply_iov_nofree() catches the wrong errno.(i.e. reports "fuse: bad error value: ...").
Make fuse_send_reply_iov_nofree() accept the correct -errno by passing errno directly in lo_copy_file_range(). Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx...@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <eg...@linux.alibaba.com> dgilbert: Sent upstream and now Merged as aa1185e153f774f1df65 --- tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c index 3c450c15b4..0666a8709d 100644 --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c @@ -2441,7 +2441,7 @@ static void lo_copy_file_range(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino_in, off_t off_in, res = copy_file_range(in_fd, &off_in, out_fd, &off_out, len, flags); if (res < 0) { - fuse_reply_err(req, -errno); + fuse_reply_err(req, errno); } else { fuse_reply_write(req, res); } -- 2.24.1