On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:14:20 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:

> On Montag, 6. Januar 2020 19:24:11 CET Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > 'out' label in v9fs_xattr_write() and 'out_nofid' label in
> > v9fs_complete_rename() can be replaced by appropriate return
> > calls.
> > 
> > CC: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/9pfs/9p.c | 9 +++------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > index 520177f40c..be2beba4cd 100644
> > --- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > @@ -2464,8 +2464,7 @@ static int v9fs_xattr_write(V9fsState *s, V9fsPDU
> > *pdu, V9fsFidState *fidp,
> > 
> > 
> >      if (fidp->fs.xattr.len < off) {
> > -        err = -ENOSPC;
> > -        goto out;
> > +        return -ENOSPC;
> >      }
> >      write_count = fidp->fs.xattr.len - off;
> >      if (write_count > count) {
> > @@ -2491,7 +2490,7 @@ static int v9fs_xattr_write(V9fsState *s, V9fsPDU
> > *pdu, V9fsFidState *fidp, off += to_copy;
> >          write_count -= to_copy;
> >      }
> > -out:
> > +
> >      return err;
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -3056,8 +3055,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn v9fs_complete_rename(V9fsPDU
> > *pdu, V9fsFidState *fidp, if (newdirfid != -1) {
> >          dirfidp = get_fid(pdu, newdirfid);
> >          if (dirfidp == NULL) {
> > -            err = -ENOENT;
> > -            goto out_nofid;
> > +            return -ENOENT;
> >          }
> >          if (fidp->fid_type != P9_FID_NONE) {
> >              err = -EINVAL;
> > @@ -3100,7 +3098,6 @@ out:
> >          put_fid(pdu, dirfidp);
> >      }
> >      v9fs_path_free(&new_path);
> > -out_nofid:
> >      return err;
> >  }
> 
> Same as with patch 44: IMO not any improvement, but also not any behaviour 
> change at least. So it's up to you Greg.
> 

I don't really care either but as you say it doesn't change behaviour, and
and the diffstat is nice :)

Acked-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>

> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
> 
> 


Reply via email to