On 1/3/20 10:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 1/3/20 5:22 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Richard,

On 12/29/19 12:11 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Code movement in an upcoming patch will show that this file
was implicitly depending on trace/mem.h being included beforehand.

Ah, it uses the TRACE_MEM_* macros from "trace/mem-internal.h", which is
include by "trace/mem.h". OK.

Which part requires "trace-root.h"? Isn't it "trace/mem-internal.h" that should
include "trace-root.h"?

I don't know -- perhaps it's not required at all.  I think I did a blind copy
of the trace related includes that were being removed.

I'v tested your series, removing "trace-root.h" from this patch and building next patches, and there is no problem, it is indeed not required at all.

Removing "trace-root.h":
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>

Regardless:
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to