On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:53:44PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >Don't see the need for that, management can simply wait for livecopy to > >finish or cancel livecopy and restart on destination after migration. > > They can do it, but I imagine it's pretty hard for them.
Well, they have to handle migration failures anyway. > > >But yeah, it should be implemented sometime... > > > > > We should make an effort not to introduce interdependencies which > make management's life harder. While this is a good principle there is no way around complexity for management here. If migration is supported, the block copy target image filenames must be specified on the destination.