* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 03/12/19 14:02, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > >> It could be in fsdev/virtiofsd, > > fsdev is currently all 9p stuff, so that would seem very confusing. > > Move it to fsdev/9p?
Greg: Are you OK with us doing that, and then having fsdev/virtiofsd for our side of things? > >> but I agree with Daniel that at this > >> point the QEMU build system introduces baggage that you may not want for > >> virtiofsd. > > > > I've already got it wired up in contrib with qemu's build system > > so that doesn't seem to be an issue. The question is purely a 'where'. > > Oh I agree it's not an insurmountable problem. For a new project I may > not want to deal with the complicated rules.mak stuff; however, if > virtiofsd doesn't have to do anything complicated then it's your choice. Fortunately we don't seem to have touched that. Dave > Paolo > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
