On Sunday, December 1, 2019, Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Aleksandar > > On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 4:15 PM Aleksandar Markovic > <aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, December 1, 2019, Marc-André Lureau < > marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> - "RFC: mips/cps: fix setting saar property" > >> > >> Perhaps I should have used FIX instead of RFC, because this should > >> actually be a real fix. However I could use someone help to exercise > >> the code path. > >> > > > > Marc-André, hi. > > > > There is a work in progress on fixing this. Can we in MIPS submit the > fix independently, since it involves some additional pieces of code that > are really deeply mips-specific? We acknowledge the bug, and want to > develop the real solution. Can you simply skip this RFC patch in your > series, since the issues will be handled separately in our patch, hopefully > soon after the merge window is open? > > > > For all other mips parts of your series, you have my "reviewed-by"s , in > case I forgot to send them explicitely. > > > > This is a one-liner, and it is required to achieve the goal of the > series, to remove PROP_PTR. > > If you prefer, I can instead comment the line with a FIXME, since it > is apparently broken anyway? > > If you manage to get your fix merged earlier, then this patch can be > dropped. Else, is it a problem for the later fixes? > > OK, Marc-André, Please go ahead with this patch, so that the goal of the series is achieved, and we will later submitt a wider patch that will address the root cause. Just remove RFC from subject, everything else looks fine to me. You can add my "reviewed-by". Yours, Aleksandar > thanks > > > -- > Marc-André Lureau >
