On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Felipe Franciosi <fel...@nutanix.com> wrote:
>
> When QOM APIs were added to ich9 in 6f1426ab, the getter for sci_int was
> written using uint32_t. However, the object property is uint8_t. This
> fixes the getter for correctness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <fel...@nutanix.com>

Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>

>  hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> index 99517c3946..9f4e00dddd 100644
> --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -631,9 +631,7 @@ static void ich9_lpc_get_sci_int(Object *obj, Visitor *v, 
> const char *name,
>                                   void *opaque, Error **errp)
>  {
>      ICH9LPCState *lpc = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(obj);
> -    uint32_t value = lpc->sci_gsi;
> -
> -    visit_type_uint32(v, name, &value, errp);
> +    visit_type_uint8(v, name, &lpc->sci_gsi, errp);
>  }
>
>  static void ich9_lpc_add_properties(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> @@ -641,7 +639,7 @@ static void ich9_lpc_add_properties(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
>      static const uint8_t acpi_enable_cmd = ICH9_APM_ACPI_ENABLE;
>      static const uint8_t acpi_disable_cmd = ICH9_APM_ACPI_DISABLE;
>
> -    object_property_add(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_SCI_INT, "uint32",
> +    object_property_add(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_SCI_INT, "uint8",
>                          ich9_lpc_get_sci_int,
>                          NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>      object_property_add_uint8_ptr(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_ACPI_ENABLE_CMD,
> --
> 2.20.1
>


-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to