On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:16:21 +0100 Janosch Frank <fran...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/19 6:34 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:38:06 +0100 > > Janosch Frank <fran...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> On 11/27/19 7:25 PM, Janosch Frank wrote: > >>> > >>> There's 0 (initiated), busy and operational and as far as I know we > >>> implement neither. > >> > >> That came out wrong... > >> s/operational/not operational/ > >> > >> We only implement "command initiated" / cc = 0 > >> We can never have busy, because we handle sclp calls synchronously. > >> The spec does not give any indication when we could return "not > >> operational". I guess that's just a free pass for hypervisors. > > > > Regardless, setcc(cpu, r) also feels a bit cleaner to me... > > Ok, do you want to change that while picking the patches up or shall I > send a new version? New version (of this patch), please :) Easier for me...
pgpaevjx6yRqV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
