On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:49:40AM +0100, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > On Sunday, November 24, 2019, Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Include AVR maintaners in MAINTAINERS file > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 5e5e3e52d6..ad2d9dd04a 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ S: Maintained > > F: hw/arm/smmu* > > F: include/hw/arm/smmu* > > > > +AVR TCG CPUs > > +M: Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> > > +S: Maintained > > +F: target/avr/ > > +F: hw/misc/avr_mask.c > > +F: hw/char/avr_usart.c > > +F: hw/timer/avr_timer16.c > > +F: hw/avr/ > > + > > > If Cleber and Eduardo don't object, please add file: > > tests/acceptance/machine_avr6.py > > to the list. This means that the file would have a sort of "dual" > maintainrship: Cleber and Eduardo would take care of Python/Avocado/test > harness aspects, while you and Sarah would take care of AVR aspects.
No objections. Thanks! > > Cleber and Eduardo, please note that AVR target will be significantly > different than others, since these CPUs are not meant to work with Linux > kernel, and there are other idiosyncracies where AVR folks would be really > needed. There is also a case of MIPS-specific Avocado test where, at least > from my point of view, dual maintainership worked well, so I think this one > would work well too. > > With or without that file addition: > > Reviewed-by: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com> -- Eduardo
